tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post2924099278381998372..comments2024-03-28T09:54:55.115-05:00Comments on Dad29: Deeper and Deeper in RacineDad29http://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-60800229889165890252012-07-16T09:04:00.831-05:002012-07-16T09:04:00.831-05:00The first link? A clear indication by you that Mc...The first link? A clear indication by you that McCain lost two close races due to alleged (D) voter fraud, and that this conduct is expected in 2012 to take place just like 2008. I think YOU should read for meaning. If (D)'s can't win a tight race, then you believe they take them illegally.<br /><br />The second link? The title. YOUR words. The inference is clear...close elections lost by (R) is due to (D) machinations.<br /><br />The third link? Again, the title. YOUR words. Very apparent how you feel.<br /><br />The meaning is clear on your part. Why even lie about it? Guilty conscious?<br /><br />Just own up to it and be done.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-62821244007667783662012-07-16T07:54:50.131-05:002012-07-16T07:54:50.131-05:00Your first link is to a post which is about the No...Your first link is to a post which is about the November election upcoming. Read for meaning....<br /><br />The second link has no comments from me indicating that Franken won 'solely by fraud', although that is a reasonable argument.<br /><br />And the third? The opening quote is real. It is exactly what the man said to me. No "assertion" that "close elections are lost solely due to fraud."<br /><br />Get a remedial reading course. It might help you. I underline "might."Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-58765008133913717112012-07-16T07:43:28.998-05:002012-07-16T07:43:28.998-05:00"I NEVER claimed that 'Democrats win clos..."I NEVER claimed that 'Democrats win close elections solely through fraud."<br /><br />Not a straw-man, FACT. Three specific instances on your part making that assertion. The implication is clear.<br /><br />dad29.blogspot.com/2012/04/elections-as-usual-democrat-style.html<br /><br />dad29.blogspot.com/2008/11/franken-and-reid-thieves.html<br /><br />dad29.blogspot.com/2010/06/old-fashioned-way-steal-elections.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-81556391210801278612012-07-16T06:53:09.061-05:002012-07-16T06:53:09.061-05:00I NEVER claimed that 'Democrats win close elec...I NEVER claimed that 'Democrats win close elections solely through fraud.'<br /><br />But you like straw-men; it's the (D) way, after all.<br /><br />I want Voter ID, like 80% of the country does. Democrats don't. Since they don't, we should look at motives.<br /><br />Just like cockroaches, the (D) folk hate light.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-34971044960856238662012-07-16T00:15:34.618-05:002012-07-16T00:15:34.618-05:00"Particularly in cases of fraud, which is des..."Particularly in cases of fraud, which is designed to be un-evident."<br /><br />Dad29, you know how ridiculous you sound? <br /><br />This is YOU--Rampant fraud exists, but we can't detect it, but we can make unfounded accusations all we want as "evidence", but when the truth comes out that there is no fraud to be found, well, it may not be there in the open, but it still has a menacing presence.<br /><br />The only "smoke" is the one your blowing up everyone's wazoo with the childish notion that in every close election that a Democrat/liberal wins, he/she won through illegal means. <br /><br />GROW UP!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-32124060115908967332012-07-15T21:54:42.460-05:002012-07-15T21:54:42.460-05:00Absence of evidence is not equal to evidence of ab...Absence of evidence is not equal to evidence of absence, fella.<br /><br />Particularly in cases of fraud, which is designed to be un-evident.<br /><br />Granted that many of the problems result from (D) city clerk training (D) paid-for-a-day "workers."<br /><br />But there's a helluvalotta smoke, regardless.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-85913519017812401432012-07-15T19:14:41.143-05:002012-07-15T19:14:41.143-05:00This is what democracy looks like!
www.jsonline.c...This is what democracy looks like!<br /><br />www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/racine-da-finds-no-voter-fraud-evidence-jo64f9u-162464556.html<br /><br />Try again, Dad29!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-90788045669926018212012-07-14T22:30:46.067-05:002012-07-14T22:30:46.067-05:00Deeper and deeper, all right...
rootriversiren.bl...Deeper and deeper, all right...<br /><br />rootriversiren.blogspot.com/2012/07/breaking-dabbraccio-finds-trash-in.html?spref=twAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com