tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post126038991215426694..comments2024-03-28T03:14:51.294-05:00Comments on Dad29: Statist 'Net?Dad29http://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-27199168268952807102011-01-24T20:32:35.835-06:002011-01-24T20:32:35.835-06:00"Not subject to judicial review" would b..."Not subject to judicial review" would be unconstitutional in and of itself, no? OTOH, this is "The Regime"Beer, Bicycles and the VRWChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08976779901265528597noreply@blogger.com