It may be a while before this gets implemented, but the Democrats/Totalitarians passed a law back in '21 which mandates that new cars will have camera-and-sensor devices which "analyze the driver" for safety.
No surprise that the Totalitarians pushed it through.
Nor is it a surprise that no Republican has proposed that it be voided by a new law.
Democrats are obviously Totalitarian.
Republicans are sneaky about it.
But hey! Trust Us!!
Keep. Buying. Ammo.
Yup
ReplyDeleteTurn your car into a spy device
Turn Traffic Cameras into spy devices.
Light bulbs...Yup.
Traffic Cameras...Yup
Eye Glasses..( Zuckerberg)
They will weaponize anything they can connect to the internet
|
Listen to this:
Can They Just Leave Us Alone?
Take a look at ~this map~of All the Flock Cameras in the USA. It shows the vast array of locations throughout the United States that have Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs). All in all, the country is stuffed with nearly 120,000 of these invasive cameras. Your city probably has them. ALPRs are AI-powered recording devices that capture and analyze images of all passing vehicles, storing details like your car’s location, date, and time. They also capture data points like vehicle makes, models, colors, and identifying features such as dents, roof racks, and even bumper stickers. Think these cameras, which local governments and police departments have spent years installing, only monitor drivers suspected of crimes? Think again. ALPRs collect data on millions of cars and trucks regardless of whether law enforcement has any good reason to snoop on the people behind the wheel. Even if you have no criminal record and have never even jaywalked, ALPRs are watching you. They are always watching you, and they share your information with thousands of agencies nationwide. If that strikes you as a brazen Fourth Amendment violation, then you are on the right track. It should come as no surprise that many Americans are not enthused about this 1984-style surveillance. They do not want to get spied on. As a solution, some have created an organization called DeFlock, which crafted the aforementioned map. It exists to inform the population which locations they should avoid if they want to maintain their basic privacy. The project performs a tremendous public service. The CEO of the company responsible for the majority of American ALPRs, called Flock, disagrees. According to him, DeFlock is a terroristic organization. We are not joking. He really said that. “[America has] organizations like the ACLU and the EFF, who take an above-the-board approach to fight for their point of view,” T-shirt-wearing CEO Garrett Langley told Forbes earlier this month. “And then, unfortunately, there’s terroristic organizations like DeFlock, whose primary motivation is chaos,” he added. Got that? According to the guy leading the charge to strip Americans of their basic ability to drive down the street without getting monitored, the people providing transparency about his operation are terrorists. They are the ones on the side of anarchy, he insists. But the precise opposite is true. Governments that constantly spy on their populations deprive their citizens of their autonomy. People behave differently if they think they are being watched, self-regulating in completely unnatural ways. This is one of the primary takeaways of George Orwell’s 1984. Big Brother did not coerce Winston Smith’s comrades into compliance by sticking guns in their faces; he did so by making it clear that everything they said or did was under surveillance. That is true anarchy, because it creates conditions in which humans live without a soul. America is far further down this path than most people would like to admit. Preferring a course correction does not make you a terrorist. Want to learn more about this story? Wednesday’s live episode of The Tucker Carlson Show |
So why isn’t Trump doing something about the “surveillance state”???
DeleteFlock CEO Apologizes For Calling Activists ‘Terrorists’
ReplyDeleteAs a movement against $8.3 billion Flock Safety’s license plate readers gathers momentum, company CEO Garrett Langley tells Forbes he shouldn’t have called non-violent activists “terroristic” organizations.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2026/07/17/flock-ceo-sorry-for-labelling-activists-terrorists/
ReplyDeleteThe Backlash Is So Strong That People With "Pervert Glasses" Are Afraid to Use Them in Public
https://futurism.com/future-society/backlash-meta-pervert-glasses-afraid
…Meta’s camera-equipped “AI Glasses” are so divisive that some adopters are now leaving their expensive smart glasses at home, as Engadget reports…..
…Mostly men, have been using the glasses to inconspicuously — and non-consensually — capture footage of themselves approaching women and attempting to hit on them, interactions they’ve then posted online for content. Some wearers have even attempted to extort victims of covert recordings for cash. That’s on top of serious allegations of alleged privacy breaches….
It is what we have come to expect from Mark Suckerberg
Mark is just doing Trump a solid, Gregory.
DeleteHis administration broadly supports the use of Meta’s smart glasses, with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) earmarking millions for smart glasses technology for immigration agents. Additionally, Ivanka Trump recently unveiled a major Meta initiative to distribute free AI glasses to legally blind American veterans.
Besides, Trump is a pervert himself. Not that you, Gregory, have any problem with that as a conservative Catholic.