Words matter. So when you're constructing a convenient story, you make the words fit your narrative.
So, for starters, they assert that they "will not permit the release of child pornography." That's a good thing, until you realize that some, most, or all of that "porn" involves not-children (adults). Who probably could be recognized. But "child porn," right? Can't let anyone see that.....
...This systematic review revealed no incriminating “client list.”...
No "client list." But was there a "contacts" on Epstein's phone? There WAS a hand-written phone directory, but that is not a "list" of clients. See? And by the way, did Ghislane Maxwell have a "list"? If she did, bumpkin, it's not "EPSTEIN'S" list, you see.
'There is no "evidence" of blackmail committed by Epstein.'
Of course not. Epstein or Maxwell merely passed on the pix and vids to Mossad. Or the CIA. Or the FBI. Or the SDNY US Attorney. Or Obozo. Or Paul Ryan, or Lockheed or...........get the idea? The benefits of "blackmail" were far more significant to those people than to Epstein. There were $Trillions at stake for them. Not for him.
Face it, bubba. You'll never know who did what to whom and who benefitted from whatever.
But hey! Trust the Government!!
You mean don’t trust Trump. He could easily authorize the release of the client list. The fact is he knows who is on that list. Powerful allies. He doesn’t want them exposed. So it’s not the gummint, it’s Trump himself. Get it right next time.
ReplyDeleteMaybe this administration is flipping the list for its own purposes.
ReplyDeleteRight. To save itself.
ReplyDelete