Is Trump Playing Games With US??

It's one thing for Trump to feint-and-dodge the Mullahs.  They deserve a shot in the groin.

But it's another thing entirely for Trump to be playing Ring-Around-the-Rosey with the US citizens.

While Trump's cheerleaders tell us that Vance whomped that CBS dame Brennan, there's another take, from Tucker:

... Rather than justifying America’s act of war by assuring the public that Iran absolutely, positively was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons like the war hawks insist, Rubio on Sunday said it doesn’t even matter if Tehran was building a bomb. The U.S. had to attack regardless.

“That’s irrelevant!” the secretary of state barked when asked if he knows for sure that Iran’s supreme leader had ordered nuclear weaponization. “I see that question being asked in the media all the time. That’s an irrelevant question.” 

We disagree. We think whether the stated reason for bombing Iran is legitimate is very important. The American people deserve to know if their government is lying to them about its motives for engaging in yet another Middle Eastern war....

Well, it's a "relevant" question--if you are Bibi.  But we are not Bibi, and Rubio is as Globalist as anyone in DC.  You don't get to be on the Senate Intel Committee without a Globalist cred.

That's not all.

... Donald Trump shined a light on the endeavor’s true objective on Sunday, writing on Truth Social that decapitating the current Iranian government, which could entangle America in this conflict for years, could be necessary to “MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN.”...

We noticed that, too.

It’s not politically correct to use the term, “Regime Change,” but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change???  --DJT, yesterday.

 As we suggested last week, the better "regime change" would be changing the regime in Israel.