tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post8415422468371381165..comments2024-03-29T08:47:16.366-05:00Comments on Dad29: WFBuckley on Congressional InvestigationsDad29http://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-15373749342716544772007-03-27T02:19:00.000-05:002007-03-27T02:19:00.000-05:00Oh I think W is not entirely on the up and up. Th...Oh I think W is not entirely on the up and up. There weren't any WMDs and we knew it. I think that there was less than complete honesty there.<BR/><BR/>That said, I think wasting time and other resources on witch hunts is irresponsible.RobKPhDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16220380405943891911noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-7520757368875521302007-03-25T20:50:00.000-05:002007-03-25T20:50:00.000-05:00My apologies. It has been a long day. What I mea...My apologies. It has been a long day. What I meant to say is: "May those who punished them be returned to <I>private</I> office."Bernard Brandthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00159541603126407072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-11876723587718545362007-03-25T20:49:00.000-05:002007-03-25T20:49:00.000-05:00I would entirely agree with you in your assessment...I would entirely agree with you in your assessment. In fact, I do.<BR/><BR/>My gripe was with the moonbats who were and are seeking some sort of apocalypse against our president. May they go with God. They may not appreciate the companionship.<BR/><BR/>As regards the border guards, these were and are honorable men and officers who did their job, and were punished for "political reasons". May those who punished them be returned to public office.Bernard Brandthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00159541603126407072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-88492603857158219652007-03-25T18:43:00.000-05:002007-03-25T18:43:00.000-05:00Bernard, no one argues that GWB could not do what ...Bernard, no one argues that GWB could not do what he did.<BR/><BR/>What's being advanced are two OTHER arguments:<BR/><BR/>1) Gonzales is a shifty-eyed creep. Time for him to go.<BR/><BR/>2) Gonzales' team failed to prosecute a number of items AND prosecuted some (the Border Patrol guys) which they should NOT have.<BR/><BR/>This has nothing to do with authority and everything to do with integrity.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-9276597314153653252007-03-25T17:47:00.000-05:002007-03-25T17:47:00.000-05:00I'm sorry, but while I think it was silly of Bush ...I'm sorry, but while I think it was silly of Bush II to have fired the U.S. Attorneys in question, as far as I know, the law is clear that he had a perfect right to do so. May I recommend that you read the following:<BR/><BR/>http://pauca_lux_ex_oriente.blogspot.com/2007/03/its-not-just-idea-its-law.html<BR/><BR/>Alternatively, you could just read 28 U.S.C. section 541, which can be found here: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00000541----000-.html<BR/><BR/>Cheers!Bernard Brandthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00159541603126407072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-63688892340018022672007-03-25T16:33:00.000-05:002007-03-25T16:33:00.000-05:00I agree, there is a problem with Gonzalez. I also ...I agree, there is a problem with Gonzalez. I also agree that the investigational ability of Congress is important, if they are, at least, semi-honorable. Unfortunately, what we see with Congress now, is a witch hunt. The only reason they want to get Rove, et al. undr oath, is so they can maybe prosecute him for lying under oath. That seems to be their new modus operendi.Billiamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15489132492383133253noreply@blogger.com