tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post7539261170532128043..comments2024-03-29T08:47:16.366-05:00Comments on Dad29: Only One Element of Act 10 Is SuspectDad29http://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-37097035276754709962012-09-17T20:28:10.084-05:002012-09-17T20:28:10.084-05:00Didn't say that; it was the opinion of a circu...Didn't say that; it was the opinion of a circuit-court judge. A lawprof happens to agree.<br /><br />The argument has merit. So?Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-37964369759510598912012-09-17T18:42:53.844-05:002012-09-17T18:42:53.844-05:00"OK. So Act 11 will further reduce taxpayer ..."OK. So Act 11 will further reduce taxpayer liabilities by including public-safety employees."<br /><br />So all along ACT 10 was unconstitutional. Thanks Dad29 for stating the obvious.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-13736885417170976952012-09-17T17:13:54.532-05:002012-09-17T17:13:54.532-05:00I thought it was Act 10 v.2I thought it was Act 10 v.2Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com