tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post739327071123921073..comments2024-03-29T08:47:16.366-05:00Comments on Dad29: Holder vs. Congress?Dad29http://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-17083030440744577452009-11-29T15:03:33.384-06:002009-11-29T15:03:33.384-06:00I understand this in the same manner as Dan. For ...I understand this in the same manner as Dan. For work already completed.Beer, Bicycles and the VRWChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08976779901265528597noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-76589099682453922642009-11-29T14:37:57.377-06:002009-11-29T14:37:57.377-06:00The way I read this is that the money is for work ...The way I read this is that the money is for work already done. While I find ACORN despicable, if they had a contract, did the work as expected, then they should be paid. If the work was done after the legislation was passed into law then they should get paid.Danhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16211149561616238625noreply@blogger.com