tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post7371497390948977692..comments2024-03-28T09:54:55.115-05:00Comments on Dad29: What They Think of YouDad29http://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-47076174857735117612011-10-22T11:56:00.311-05:002011-10-22T11:56:00.311-05:00Care to provide a counter-argument, SR, or continu...Care to provide a counter-argument, SR, or continue with your Benny Hill impression. I await your commentary with eager anticipation.<br /><br />ZorroAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-6029012840988139132011-10-22T08:09:16.218-05:002011-10-22T08:09:16.218-05:00..."spot on"...?!
Well, then, bloke, th......"spot on"...?!<br /><br />Well, then, bloke, that bushwa belongs in the loo.<br /><br />Pip pip, tally ho, and all that rot.<br /><br />Cheerio.<br /><br />Idiota.Saint Revolutionnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-71371874384723491992011-10-21T07:32:20.070-05:002011-10-21T07:32:20.070-05:00Zero, that's hilarious! Regardless, anony'...Zero, that's hilarious! Regardless, anony's 7:40 p.m. post is spot on.<br /><br />ZorroAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-81614788547741130812011-10-20T21:35:08.063-05:002011-10-20T21:35:08.063-05:00So is Zero not signing his posts now...or is the t...So is Zero not signing his posts now...or is the truther suddenly writing like Zero?<br /><br />DavidAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-61885149938319984352011-10-20T20:05:42.340-05:002011-10-20T20:05:42.340-05:00Croly also would like to be the sole judge of &quo...Croly also would like to be the sole judge of "selfishness" and "erroneous."<br /><br />SO would I. But that's not sufficient, you know.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-73706647282563829212011-10-20T20:03:57.697-05:002011-10-20T20:03:57.697-05:00an individualism that asked only to be left to one...<i>an individualism that asked only to be left to one's own designs was<br />"morally obnoxious", and that the individualism of a rights-based political system co-opted the goals with which the Founding Fathers had set out to achieve.</i><br /><br />Really? And what "goals" were those? Did they write the 10th Amendment simply to spill ink? What about the 9th?Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-75342166436757139672011-10-20T19:40:49.391-05:002011-10-20T19:40:49.391-05:00That quote is COMPLETELY taken out of context by t...That quote is COMPLETELY taken out of context by the author to appear that Croly lacked the faith and trust of the individual American citizen. He is NOT making that assertion. Rather, an individualism that asked only to be left to one's own designs was <br />"morally obnoxious", and that the individualism of a rights-based political system co-opted the goals with which the Founding Fathers had set out to achieve.<br /><br />Following the quotation highlighted in red is...<br /><br />"An American national democracy must always prove its right to a further advance, not only by the development of a policy and method adequate for the particular occasion, but by its ability to overcome the inevitable opposition of selfish interests and erroneous ideas. The logic of its position makes it the aggressor, just as the logic of its opponents’ position ties them to a negative and protesting or merely insubordinate part. If the latter should prevail, their victory would become tantamount to national dissolution, either by putrefaction, by revolution, or by both."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com