tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post4023909010552885103..comments2024-03-28T09:54:55.115-05:00Comments on Dad29: SCOTUS '58 or "Nullification"?Dad29http://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-80633667718826855202011-01-22T17:17:47.359-06:002011-01-22T17:17:47.359-06:00And it is true that SCOTUS has nothing to do with ...And it is true that SCOTUS has nothing to do with the law (not in any commonsensical way, anyway)Beer, Bicycles and the VRWChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08976779901265528597noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-69339026207329142632011-01-22T17:12:05.141-06:002011-01-22T17:12:05.141-06:00Puts me in mind of an episode of All in the Family...Puts me in mind of an episode of <i>All in the Family</i>, where Archie and the Meathead are debating the Second Amendment. The Meathead cites to a 1939 Supreme Court decision to argue that the introductory clause of the Amendment means that the right to keep and bear arms does not inure to the individual citizen. Archie retorts: "The Supreme Court ain't got nuthin' to do with the law!"<br /><br />(Of course, just a couple of years ago, the Supreme Court rejected the Meathead's interpretation of the Second Amendment...)Anita Moorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11305092097247290243noreply@blogger.com