tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post2692893741959169034..comments2024-03-28T09:54:55.115-05:00Comments on Dad29: Did Kagan Lie During Senate Hearing?Dad29http://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-22429047419880335822011-12-10T20:28:36.459-06:002011-12-10T20:28:36.459-06:00Well, Jim, you have to demonstrate your accusation...Well, Jim, you have to demonstrate your accusations, you know.<br /><br />I did. Kagan WAS involved in advice re Obozocare, no matter her written denials.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-74599108029480106662011-12-10T14:22:50.291-06:002011-12-10T14:22:50.291-06:00OK, here is from your link:
The complaint argued ...OK, here is from your link:<br /><br /><i>The complaint argued that a health-care bill passed under the Slaughter rule would not be a law because it did not satisfy the bicameral voting requirements of Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution.</i><br /><br />Clearly this complaint is about the legislative process and NOT about the provisions of the PPACA itself.<br /><br />If a suit about the way in which the PPACA made it to the president's desk reaches the Court, then you MAY have a case for Kagan's recusal.<br /><br />That said, I'm sure no Supreme Court Justice, including Scalia, Alito, Roberts, and Thomas was ever less than fully forthcoming during their confirmation hearings.Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10004209843701697773noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-62824887729705656752011-12-10T11:47:29.312-06:002011-12-10T11:47:29.312-06:00You might want to read the basis for Levin's t...You might want to read the basis for Levin's threat-of-suit.<br /><br />The Constitution is dead-center of the argument he proposed--and the one SHE reviewed.<br /><br />Try again.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-19150617677157847562011-12-10T11:19:41.122-06:002011-12-10T11:19:41.122-06:00Judging by what you have presented in your post, I...Judging by what you have presented in your post, I see no issue in Kagan's reply.<br /><br />The subject memos appear to be solely about the legislative process in passing the bill into law and have nothing to do with the "underlying" constitutionality of the contents of the PPACA.<br /><br />Try again.Jimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10004209843701697773noreply@blogger.com