tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post2620791062500155404..comments2024-03-29T08:47:16.366-05:00Comments on Dad29: The Clown-Chancellor: John WileyDad29http://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-59455966061789168332008-11-14T16:41:00.000-06:002008-11-14T16:41:00.000-06:00Look at your own post before asking me to work on ...Look at your own post before asking me to work on the substance, 29.<BR/><BR/>A few points: <BR/>First, you are using misleading language when you say that Wiley had an "assignment" or that this was a "memo". Like I said before, this was a PERSONAL email about a public topic. Certainly not a memo. <BR/>Secondly, I have honestly no idea where you are getting that he was requested to ruminate on republicans. The question Faulkner actually asked him was, I quote, "The question I am sometimes asked is 'why is WMC bad for education'. I believe I have heard you say that it is. Could you help me answer that question with a few specifics? Thanks." How you read this as "Ruminate on Republicans please" is beyond me.<BR/><BR/>The irony certainly doesn't get past me that you are criticizing him for not being able to "argue with substance", and then proceed to make an argument based on typos. Look in the mirror.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-85439223432141855602008-11-14T15:10:00.000-06:002008-11-14T15:10:00.000-06:00Try working on the substance of the post, Anony.Wi...Try working on the substance of the post, Anony.<BR/><BR/>Wiley's assignment was to provide specifics, not to ruminate, (or diarrheate) about Republicans.<BR/><BR/>So why don't you find specifics in his memo?<BR/><BR/>Oh--that's right--you can't. Gee, I guess with a PhD in Physics and a Chancellorate on his resume, he STILL can't write, nor argue with substance.<BR/><BR/>Oh, well.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-62824363523460311952008-11-14T13:10:00.000-06:002008-11-14T13:10:00.000-06:00Sorry 29, I'll beat you to it and ignore my entire...Sorry 29, I'll beat you to it and ignore my entire point just to comment on the fact that I am guilty of typos as well.<BR/><BR/>psychics != physicsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-24278580994891481012008-11-14T13:06:00.000-06:002008-11-14T13:06:00.000-06:00Are you actually suggesting that just because a pa...Are you actually suggesting that just because a packet of information passes through a "STATE-OWNED" computer that packet is no longer personal? How do you define personal, then? <BR/><BR/>You truly have your values messed up when you call someone with a Ph.D in psychics, and a chancellor of a university with over 40,000 students a "intellectual pygmy" over a few typos. Or the fact that you would call him an "intellectual pygmy" at all.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-72304203209157055982008-11-14T12:46:00.000-06:002008-11-14T12:46:00.000-06:00PERSONAL email?That PERSONAL email was sent from a...PERSONAL email?<BR/><BR/>That PERSONAL email was sent from a STATE-OWNED computer and used STATE-OWNED routers, telecom lines, etc.<BR/><BR/>And composition is composition. I don't really care what one writes...but if it's slop, it tells you something.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-36234891567778571692008-11-14T11:50:00.000-06:002008-11-14T11:50:00.000-06:00The real joke is that the best argument that you c...The real joke is that the best argument that you can come up with against the WMC is a couple of misspellings in a PERSONAL email. <BR/><BR/>The last time I saw the ex-Chancellor I congratulated him on joining the fight against the WMC, and I hope he will continue to do the same.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com