tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post2482782997877970308..comments2024-03-28T03:14:51.294-05:00Comments on Dad29: Kmiec Denied Communion: Chapter TwoDad29http://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-42733516421529459652008-08-07T15:38:00.000-05:002008-08-07T15:38:00.000-05:00In addition, the "seemless garment" crap that Bern...In addition, the "seemless garment" crap that Bernardin and Mahoney invented as a pro-abortion ruse doesn't work for ObambiKmiec on any level - since he has done the 180 and now supports the death penalty and border enforcement.<BR/><BR/>He's 0 for 3. Kmiec's a liberal nitwit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-29350537524565320942008-07-26T23:19:00.000-05:002008-07-26T23:19:00.000-05:00Those that are obstinat in public sin can not rece...Those that are obstinat in public sin can not receive Communion. A pro-abortion poltician that's in the public eye. I'm tendent to agree with the priest on this one, but I don't know all the details.Joe of St. Thérèsehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06506671882770822003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-33801000446721058622008-07-24T20:47:00.000-05:002008-07-24T20:47:00.000-05:00Further, DY, learn to read.Peters and I are in tot...Further, DY, learn to read.<BR/><BR/>Peters and I are in total agreement (TOTAL) that it is the priest's call.<BR/><BR/>And Peters and I are in TOTAL agreement that the priest was wrong.<BR/><BR/>Maybe you spent too much time in the sun today?Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-69799041079440245842008-07-24T20:44:00.000-05:002008-07-24T20:44:00.000-05:00Find ONE un-true item in Roeser's essay--just one....Find ONE un-true item in Roeser's essay--just one.<BR/><BR/>The scandal, DY, is Cardinal Mahony.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-80026854606536926942008-07-24T20:36:00.000-05:002008-07-24T20:36:00.000-05:00Peters offered his opinion on the case. He said i...Peters offered his opinion on the case. He said it wasn't even close. http://www.canonlaw.info/2008/05/was-prof-douglas-kmiec-really-denied.html<BR/><BR/>Roemer may have knowledge of some things, but he ain't offering it here. His main offering scandal mongering.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-23623907347397501332008-07-24T16:54:00.000-05:002008-07-24T16:54:00.000-05:00See this discussion:http://www.canonlaw.info/2007/...See this discussion:<BR/><BR/>http://www.canonlaw.info/2007/05/primer-for-those-who-prefer-knowing-to_4375.html<BR/><BR/>There is no question that the priest makes the call.<BR/><BR/>He MAY have made the wrong call, and I am inclined to think that he did, based on Peters' take.<BR/><BR/>But there is a strong case that can be made for the priest, under C. 915.<BR/><BR/>The case FOR the priest goes as follows: Kmiec, a Catholic of some repute (i.e., not Joe Schmoe) openly and loudly supports a candidate who is 100% wrong on the question of abortion.<BR/><BR/>Not only does he loudly and publicly support that candidate, but Kmiec also writes articles and essays attempting to persuade OTHER Catholics (and non-Catholics) that the candidate is better than his competitor.<BR/><BR/>Were Kmiec actually "Joe Schmoe," I would argue that the priest was wrong.<BR/><BR/>But Kmiec is NOT "Joe Schmoe." His actions and words get attention, and have the potential of swaying enough people so that the 100%-wrong candidate gets elected.<BR/><BR/>Thus the prudential judgment that under 915, the priest is right.<BR/><BR/>Personally, I would judge the priest to be wrong (assuming that what we know is all that is to be known about the case.) <BR/><BR/>But if I were Mahony, I would reprimand the priest AND Kmiec equally. Further, I would treat both reprimands equally: either both are public, or both are private.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-68350209126588405462008-07-24T16:40:00.000-05:002008-07-24T16:40:00.000-05:00Roeser is better-informed than either you or I.And...Roeser is better-informed than either you or I.<BR/><BR/>And, by the way, the priest has a good defense based in Canon Law. It IS a judgment-call for the PRIEST to make, not for anyone else, under Canon law.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-54881769075984293912008-07-24T16:00:00.000-05:002008-07-24T16:00:00.000-05:00He doesn't have any real information and is just b...He doesn't have any real information and is just blowing smoke. If you would take off your ideological glasses you would see that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com