tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post2386150685353399509..comments2024-03-29T08:47:16.366-05:00Comments on Dad29: No Religious Freedom in Wisconsin?Dad29http://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-24059345485849313642015-04-02T07:03:42.823-05:002015-04-02T07:03:42.823-05:00Yah. I saw Esenberg's item yesterday.Yah. I saw Esenberg's item yesterday.Dad29https://www.blogger.com/profile/08554276286736923821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-46437252063509954642015-04-02T06:37:32.347-05:002015-04-02T06:37:32.347-05:00I'm a bit late to this party, but RFRA-type pr...I'm a bit late to this party, but RFRA-type protections are a matter of "settled" case law, courtesy Justices Abrahmson and Bradley.<br /><br />Then again, when has that (or anything else, including statutes and constitutions) stopped the lieberals?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12897315.post-76543453367803362222015-03-28T10:48:27.564-05:002015-03-28T10:48:27.564-05:00Georgia's legislature is still in session, but...Georgia's legislature is still in session, but as of yesterday it looks like our religious freedom bill won't survive. It was tabled after a successful poison pill amendment was added by the House Judiciary committee. There's still a chance to save it, but it's a longshot. <br /><br />Which is fun because, although free exercise is formally encoded in our constitution for state employees, private citizens are not protected by Georgia state law. That is, there's a constitutional provision forbidding religious tests for public office, but there's nothing similar to protect you as a private citizen from being punished for religious free expression. Grimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07543082562999855432noreply@blogger.com